Sunday, August 18, 2013

Book by Shri RK Ohri: Long March of Islam: The Future Imperfect and related article


Price :
$44.50
ISBN # :
9788170491866
Author :
R.K. Ohri
pages:
438
Edition :
Hardcover
Volumes :
1
Publisher :
Manas Publications
Published :
2004
 This book is about tomorrow and that day after - an alert about mankind's future imperfect! By 2025, Muslims will comprise 30 per-cent of the world population. That could destabilize many countries and regions. The Indian subcontinent is likely to be one of the conflict zones. As envisioned by Pakistan's ideologue, Allama Iqbal, the Islamists hope to restore the lost grandeur of Islam on the strength of sharply raising numbers and the time-tested strategy of jihad.

The author has analysed Pakistan's role in Islam's long march and identified the regions likely to be worst affected. The ‘Long March of Islam’ is the culmination of a long and painstaking research into the emerging Islamist threat and its likely impact on the future of mankind with special reference to India. The book also contains an incisive analysis of the future demographic developments across the globe and the likely impact of the changing population profile of India on the growth of religion-based fault line conflicts in the subcontinent.

This book was added to South Asia bookstore on Monday 11 July, 2011.

“It would be in order to recall late P.N. Mari Bhat and Francis Zavier’s analysis that the fertility of Muslims was about 10% higher than that of Hindus before independence and is now 25 to 30% higher than the Hindu rate. Hindus have lost considerable ground since 1947. Yet no Hindu political or spiritual leader has tried to rouse the millions of ill-informed Hindus about the looming threat of demographic decimation of their ancient faith and civilizational values.” – R.K. Ohri

Tool of asymmetric war
Islamists are great strategists. Decades ago, while Europe slept and India slumbered, their leaders decided on a powerful global game changer, seeing in demography the key to power in a democracy, as elections are won or lost on the basis of voter support to a particular party or candidate. So, to achieve their ambition of world dominion, they decided on a global campaign to overwhelm the world by sheer increase in Muslim population. This is now emerging as a deadly weapon for capturing power in many parts of the world. Christian Europe and Hindu-dominated India appear to be on the hit list for takeover through fast population growth. After a limbo of nearly four centuries, radical Islam is again in fast forward mode.

Islam is essentially conquest oriented, as can be seen from the Quran, the Hadith and two authentic commentaries, the Sahi Bukhari and the Sahi Muslim. Its ultimate goal is Dar ul Islam, to be done first by inviting infidels to voluntarily accept the religion of the Prophet (‘Dawa’), or else by recourse to jihad. This quest has now been resumed.

Muslim strategists endeavour to humble non-Muslim civilizations by waging asymmetric war – jihad – against them through non-State actors promoted by Islamic States for launching terrorist attacks across the world.
Many bleeding heart liberals have been highly critical of US action against jihadi terrorists without acknowledging the repetitive targeting of US outposts and troops for years before the daring 9/11 attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon.

In 1995, an American training facility was bombed in Riyadh (Saudi Arabia) and five US soldiers killed. The same year, an attempt was made in Sudan to assassinate the then Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, who was regarded by Islamists as a US stooge. In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed, killing 224 persons including 12 Americans. American intelligence agencies said these attacks were organised by bin Laden’s Al Qaeda, which was responsible for attacking USS Cole near Yemen, claiming the lives of 17 US marines and soldiers. The attack on Twin Towers was the last straw which prompted the then US President George Bush to declare war on Al Qaeda.

9/11 was followed by a dastardly attack on the Indian Parliament on 13 December 2001 by Jaish-e-Muhammad and Lashkar-e-Tayeba. Since then, the western world and India have been subjected to thousands of jihadi attacks, the most spectacular being the Mumbai Massacre of 26 November 2008. The last decade has seen, world over, possibly 18,300 jihadi attacks in various countries. The cost in terms of human lives is nearly 60,000 innocents killed and roughly another 90,000 injured worldwide.

Most attacks were by so-called non-State Actors. But it is well-known that all non-State actors are fathered, nurtured and armed by one or other Islamic country. Pakistan has played a stellar role in fostering and strengthening Al Qaeda and Taliban, apart from siring Lashkar-e-Tayyeba and Jaish-e-Mohammed. Another Islamic strategy (sanctioned by the Prophet, as stated in Mishkat-ul-Masabih) is to exhort the faithful to have more children for multiplying the global strength of Umma.

This was clinically analysed by late Oriana Fallaci in her seminal The Force of Reason. She showed that the ultimate goal of Islamists is to overwhelm and overrun all non-Muslim countries by sheer growth in numbers and simultaneously undermine their governance by migration and infiltration of surplus Muslim population into non-Muslim countries. This demographic jihad of Islam has the potential to destroy democracy, root and branch. Once democracy is put to sleep through a demographic coup, a Shariah-ruled State can be established.

The campaign for increasing Muslim population, in non-Muslim countries and Muslim societies, is being pushed forward with the help of Ulema and Islamic scholars who issue regular diktats directing Muslims not to accept the small family norm on the ground that Islam does not permit use of contraceptives. Simultaneously, the growing population in Muslim dominated countries is being pushed into non-Muslim countries for jobs, with a long-term objective of establishing domination. This double whammy of increasing Muslim population and promoting migration and infiltration into non-Muslim countries has played havoc with the geopolitical scene in many countries where Muslims are still in minority.
Importance of Demography

To progress economically, a country needs adequate and efficient human resources. It also needs an ample reservoir of youthful manpower to defend its borders from predators and hostile groups; especially countries like India, China, America, Russia and Australia which have extensive land mass, large borders and over-stretched coastlines. The demographic constituents of a society determine a nation’s societal mores, its religious and social composition and socio-political attitudes, the mode of governance and civilisational values.

Death by Demography
Rewind to 1974 when Algerian President Boumedienne famously declared in his address to the UN General Assembly: “One day millions of men will leave the southern hemisphere of this planet to burst upon the northern one. But not as friends. Because they will burst in to conquer, and they will conquer by populating it with their children. Victory will come to us from the wombs of our women”.

In The Force of Reason, Oriana Fallaci dubbed this ‘the Policy-of-the-Womb’ for breeding Muslims in abundance and then exporting them to take possession of a territory or a country. She said a Resolution passed in the same year during a session of the Islamic Conference at Lahore in Pakistan spelt out a plan to turn into a tide the then modest flow of immigrants to Europe and penetrate the continent through demographic preponderance. She said that in every mosque of Europe, the Friday prayer is accompanied by the Imam’s exhortation to Muslim women to bear at least five children. And if the immigrant has two wives, they will have ten children and so on…

Fallaci chided European liberals as ‘intellectual cicadas’ for promoting fundamentalist Islam across the continent. Long before Geert Wilders took up cudgels against the rising crescendo of radical Islam across Europe, Fallaci was the first intellectual to warn that Christians were in the midst of “a cultural, political and existential war” with Islam. She recalled an interview with Palestinian leader George Habash in Beirut in March 1972; he told her the Palestinian problem was more than a clash with Israel, their enemy was the whole West, including Europe and America. “Our revolution is a part of the world revolution”, he asserted.

He meant it was going to be the cultural war, the demographic war, the religious war, waged by stealing a country from its citizens. Without mincing words, George Habash disclosed the global agenda of Islam: “To advance step by step. Milimeter by millimeter. Year after year. Decade after decade. Determined, stubborn and patient. This is our strategy. A strategy that we shall expand throughout the planet.”

So as early as the 1970s, the Muslim leadership across the globe had formulated a grand plan of a demographic coup. Rapid growth in Muslim population is now a worldwide phenomenon, especially in non-Muslim countries like India, Nepal and Thailand. Akbar S. Ahmed, a Pakistani diplomat turned scholar, boasts that due to a unique combination of geo-political factors, Islam is in confrontation with all major religions: Judaism in the Middle East, Christianity in the Balkans, Chechnya, Nigeria, Sudan, and sporadically in The Philippines and Indonesia, Hinduism in south Asia, and after the Taliban blew up the statues in Bamiyan, Buddhism.

It seems that an Islamogeddon, turbo-driven by billions of petro-dollars bankrolled by Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries, and strategically powered by Pakistan’s jihadi storm-troopers, is on the move across Europe and India.

The case of Lebanon
Lebanon is a classic example of a society driven to violent politico-religious civil war on account of large-scale demographic changes due to fast decline in the fertility rate of Maronite Christians. In 1932, Maronite Christians comprised roughly 55% of Lebanon’s population; Muslims were around 45%.

On this basis, Lebanon’s National Pact of 1943 stipulated that political power would be shared between Christians and Muslims as per ratio of their population in the country. Consequently, the posts of top ministers were apportioned between Christians and Muslims in a ratio of 6:5 (six posts to Christians, 5 to Muslims). It was further decided that the President of Lebanon would be a Christian and the Prime Minister a Muslim.
But within three decades, the tables were turned on the Christians. Due to large-scale acceptance of the small family norm, their share in the country’s population fell sharply and around 1970-72 Lebanon became a Muslim majority country. The denouement came because the fertility of Christians declined to four children per woman from the earlier average of six, while Muslims maintained their fertility rate at six children per woman. The decline could not be reversed despite the efforts of community leaders.

The civilisational conflicts started rising sharply even before the climactic demographic change. When Muslims became the majority community and staked claim to rule over the country, a civil war broke out in 1975 between the two communities. Ultimately the jihadi militias aided by Syria and neighbouring Muslim countries carried the day in a decade-long civil war. The Christians were routed; a few lakh migrated to Europe and USA. Presently the Christian population of Lebanon stands reduced to 25 percent or less and is declining rapidly. The embers of the civil war continue to glow every now and then leading to occasional outbreak of hostilities between the two communities.

Belatedly, European and American strategic analysts have woken up to the threat posed by the demographic surge of Islam. According to a study by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the Muslim population across the world was estimated at 1.65 billion in 2008 (global headcount 6.69 billion). Thus Muslims already constitute 24.31% of the world population.

A survey by the Pew Research Centre in 2009, however, placed the Muslim population at 1.57 billion and world population at 6.8 billion. The 2010 survey by Pew Research Forum shows Muslim population growing worldwide at 1.5% per annum, while the population of non-Muslims is growing barely at 0.7%.


Christian Europe is in serious panic because the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) of Muslims in Europe is three times higher than that of Christians. In 1900, Muslims constituted only 12% of the world population; now they are touching 25 percent in just one hundred years. And in tandem with the percentage increase in Muslim population, the incidence of jihad against non-Muslims across the globe has increased.

Saturday, August 17, 2013

Letter from MP to His Son

My dear son,

When you went abroad to study, it was with a clear understanding that, once you finish your education you would return to India. We took a family decision when your education ended; that it made sense for you to stay in the US for a few years more, enjoy your youth, money and then return and stand for elections as Member of Parliament from the constituency our family has represented for so many decades.

It has been five years since you left, and, last week, when we spoke on Skype, you told me that you believed that it was time to return. At first, I was delighted. Then, after the call was over, the import of what you planned to do sank in. My impulse was to call you back immediately, but I thought I’d put my thoughts down in an email so that you have a better understanding of what I want to say and why I say it.

In a nutshell, I do not want you to return to India. The India of today is not the India that you left. Much has changed – and much of the change negatively affects families like ours. There is a change in the balance of power in society. People do not understand what people like me, member of parliament, do – and no longer acknowledge that all of us, thanks to the great sacrifices we make for our constituency, do not live like normal people.

Just the other day, a fellow Member of Parliament was almost shamed in the context of what media is calling a Rs 71 lakh ‘scam’. The media, who no longer seem to have respect for people like us, are harassing him the whole day, treating him like a common cheat.

Even worse is the case of Robert Vadra, Priyankaji’s husband. It seems DLF lent Robertji Rs 65 crore without any security – and the media and social activists are making that out to be a crime. What crime? Many friends in business have lent me hundreds of crores without any security over the decades – and they haven’t even asked for me to return it. Why would they? After all, as a friend, I’ve helped them on so many instances that they’ve earned fortunes from our friendship. Now, media is making it sound like it’s a crime for MPs and ministers to help friends. What a terrible state of affairs.

Sharad Pawar’s nephew has been forced to resign because of some allegations on a developmental work that he was involved in. Media says that he helped contractors make extra money by approving of rises in estimates after the contracts were awarded. What is wrong with that? Your grandfather used to do the same with his friends, as did I. Ministers like Raja, Kanimozhi and Kalmadi have been jailed because of trying to help their friends. This is where our country is going to. No one has any respect for our class any more, and the media and social activists are being helped by the courts – they’re ganging up against us.

Things are bad in India, son. It is becoming difficult for people like us to carry on in the way we are used to. We are treated like commoners, we are called cheats and thugs. We’re reaching a stage when toll booth attendants expect us to pay – an FIR was filed against an MP who, obviously got upset at the request and threatened the attendant with a gun for his cheek.

It is getting very petty. The other day, Air-India staff at Guwahati charged three MPs for carrying excess baggage. MPs not being allowed excess baggage on the national airline, and lowly employees of Air-India not respecting them? This is the new India, the India you want to come back to!

That’s why I write this note to you. Do not come back to India, and forget about plans on a career in politics. Come to Geneva next week;
I will meet you there. I will transfer money to your account so that you can invest in a house in New York. As far as business is concerned, maybe you could buy a University nearby. After all, your Uncle has six universities in India and they are quite profitable. I will ask him to guide you when you begin
your venture.

Will discuss in detail when we meet next week.

With love from your father.


MP Makhanchor

Congress has never been hard on Pakistan....

By Shri Priyadarshi Dutta on August 7, 2013
Congress has never been hard on Pakistan
The butchering of five Indian soldiers in the Poonch Sector of Jammu & Kashmir by Pakistani raiders has shocked the nation. It has revived the memories of decapitation of two Indian soldiers at Mendher Sector earlier this year. What is sinister is that the latest raid is apparently a joint operation of Pakistani Army regulars and Jihadi outfits like Lashkar-e-Tayebba, Hizbul Mujahideen and Jaish-e-Mohammed.

India as usual lodged protest with Pakistan, something it has been doing for long. India is no stranger to such raids by Pakistani forces and its proxies. It had to reckon with such sporadic cross-border enterprises throughout the Nehruvian era. Nehru, in his additional capacity of Minister of External Affairs, was often drawn into the issue inside Parliament. In those days, the Minister of External Affairs, or his deputy, rather than the Defence Minister replied Parliament questions on this subject. A survey of Rajya Sabha Q&A from 1950s and early 1960s brings out the callous approach of the Nehruvian establishment toward cross-border raid.

Here are some snippets-

Raids in Malda, West Bengal (1957): On August 12, 1957 Nawab Singh Chauhan raised the issue of Pakistan’s raids in Malda district of West Bengal on May 20-21, 1957. Prior to 1971, Pakistan encompassed both western and eastern (now Bangladesh) flanks. Nehru coolly informed that on May 20, 1957 five Pakistani nationals, aided by 11 armed Pakistani policemen had trespassed into Indian territory in Mouza Ghurnimadia, JL No142, Police Station English Bazar, district Malda and lifted 48 heads of cattle to Pakistan, after threatening the cowherds. On May 21, about 35 armed Pakistani nationals trespassed into Indian territory and attempted to kidnap an Indian national who was ploughing a  land in Mouza Fatehpur, Police Station Kaliachak, district Malda. Faling in their attempt, they took away a pair of bullocks. The Government of West Bengal had then lodged a protest with East Pakistan and urged them to return the cattle to their owners and to punish the offender. The Government of India apparently did not bother even to protest!

Raids in Ganganagar, Rajasthan (1961): On November 27, 1961, JC Chatterji raised the issue of armed raid by Pakistanis on Dandera village, District Ganganagar, Rajasthan. Lakshmi Menon, Deputy External Affairs Minister, informed that on September 2, 1961 some eight raiders from Pakistan drove away eight camels and also looted about four tolas of gold and 230 tolas of silver from silver from inhabitants of two villages. The West Pakistan Rangers reported they had recovered the stolen goods. But the meeting scheduled for November 8, 1961 for restoration of said property could not be held. Nehru was not willing to read much. Such incidents, to Nehru, were merely criminal activities best kept out of bilateral relationship.

5 Jawans killed at LoC: Raid in Bikaner, Rajasthan (1955): On March 1, 1955 SN Dwivedy raised the issue on a gang from Pakistan entering Baggu near Bikaner and killing three Indian police constables on January 4, 1955. Anil K Chanda, Deputy External Affairs Minister, said a protest had been lodged with Pakistan. In a diplomatic lingo, the Minister said, “In addition to the protest lodged with the Government of Pakistan in regard to the incident, it has been suggested to the Government that the question of adopting some effective machinery for prompt disposal of complaints relating to such incidents as well as the establishment of peaceful and friendly regime on the border in co-operation between the police and other authorities should be discussed between the representatives of two countries! It was a near perfect example of Nehruvian gibberish by his deputy.

Raids in J&K (1954): On September 22, 1954 , Anil K Chanda informed the House that there were 76 border raids by Pakistan in the J&K border in 1953. There were 71 raids and five violations of the ceasefire line. During the period January to July, 1954, there were 50 border raids, 46 raids and four violations of the ceasefire line. The Deputy Minister said such incidents could not be eliminated altogether.

Pakistan troops fire on Army post in Poonch Sector, 5 jawans killed: Raids in Cooch Behar, West Bengal (1961): On April 20, 1961, Niranjan Singh raised the issue Pakistani raid in a village of Cooch Behar district in West Bengal. Deputy External Affairs Minister, Lakshmi Menon replied some Pakistani nationals armed with deadly weapons raided the house of certain Mahesh Chandra Barman in the border village of Himkumari on the night of March 14-15, 1961 and killed him. The information with the Government was that they were invited to commit the crime by some Indian nationals who had a land dispute with the victim. The Deputy Minister felt it was purely a case of murder with no political implication.

East Pakistan Rifles firing in Khasi and Jaintia Hills, Assam (1963): On December 21, 1963, Nehru gave a statement on East Pakistan Rifles firing incident in Lobhacherra sector in United Khasi and Jaintia Hills in Assam. The firing had lasted from December 9 to December 19 when a ceasefire took place. The East Pakistan Rifles had entrenched themselves on a thickly forested tilla 200 to 300 yards within Indian territory. Indian security forces also returned fire. Though there was no casualty on Indian side, two soldiers went missing only to return later. The Assam Government strongly protested the incident.

Army Chief to review security situation in Poonch today
Nehru never talked of befitting response or strong reply to such acts of Pakistani raid. Most of these raids were directed upon civilians. Obviously, the State was failing in its duty to protect its citizens against external incursions. But Nehru could not care less. He institutionalised the tepid response towards these aggressions. The legacy refuses to leave his party, leading partner in ruling coalition today. No wonder India would merely protest against killing of five Army soldiers. Pakistan meanwhile will plot about the next ‘action’

The first three Bharat Ratnas saw the future with clarity


http://bharatkalyan97.blogspot.in/2013/08/the-first-three-bharat-ratnas-saw.html

A CHRONICLE FORETOLD
- The first three Bharat Ratnas saw the future with clarity

Gopalkrishna Gandhi Thursday , August 15 , 2013 
(From top) : C.V. Raman, S. Radhakrishnan, C. Rajagopalachari
Three Indians were decorated with the Bharat Ratna in the very first year — 1954 — that the civilian awards were instituted: the elder statesman, Chakravarti Rajagopalachari, the vice- president, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and the Nobel laureate, C.V. Raman. No one said at the time that all three were south Indian, all three Brahmins. Their pre-eminence was manifest. They accepted the decoration with respect and went about their work according to their lights.

All three had a Calcutta connection. CR had served as the first governor of West Bengal, the other two had taught, with distinction and dedication, at the University of Calcutta. Om krato smara kritam smara, the Isha Upanishad tells us. The work alone is to be remembered, the work alone.

It is instructive to see, on the anniversary of our Independence, what these men had to say in the midst of and, indeed, from the very heart of their work, about their country, their people.

CR was a prisoner of the raj in 1921. Holed up in Vellore Jail, he could have been bitter about his jailors, about the imperial power. He could have looked forward to swaraj as one might to a dreamlike goal. But no, he did something that surprised his contemporaries then and surprises us now. He wrote in his jail diary: “We all ought to know that Swaraj will not at once or, I think, even for a long time to come, be better government or greater happiness for the people. Elections and their corruptions, injustice, and the power and tyranny of wealth, and inefficiency of administration, will make a hell of life as soon as freedom is given to us. Men will look regretfully back to the old regime of comparative justice, and efficient, peaceful, more or less honest administration. The only thing gained will be that as a race we will be saved from dishonour and subordination.”

This was a full quarter century before swarajwas attained.

Radhakrishnan was a member of the constituent assembly on the midnight of August 14/15, 1947 when, with Jawaharlal Nehru, he made a speech of surpassing value. Reminding the nation of “our national faults of character, our domestic despotism, obscurantism, narrow-mindedness, superstitious bigotry”, he said almost exactly what CR had said 25 years earlier. 

Radhakrishnan’s words: “Our opportunities are great but let me warn you that when power strips ability, we will fall on evil days… From tomorrow morning — from midnight today — we can no longer throw the blame on the British. We have to assume the responsibility ourselves for what we do. A free India will be judged by the way in which it will serve the interests of the common man in the matter of food, clothing, shelter and the social services. Unless we destroy corruption in high places, root out every trace of nepotism, love of power, profiteering and black-marketing which have spoiled the good name of this great country in recent times, we will not be able to raise the standards of efficiency in administration…”

That was said at the very moment free India was born.

I do not have access to any comment made by C.V. Raman on the eve of Independence but the following observation of CVR’s to young Indians is an agnatic cousin of CR’s and SR’s: “Success can only come to you by courageous devotion to the task lying in front of you and there is nothing worth in this world that can come without the sweat of our brow. I can assert without fear of contradiction that the quality of the Indian mind is equal to the quality of any Teutonic, Nordic or Anglo-Saxon mind. What we lack is perhaps courage, what we lack is perhaps driving force which takes one anywhere. We have, I think, developed an inferiority complex. I think what is needed in India today is the destruction of that defeatist spirit…”

Today, those three Bharat Ratnas would have been saddened to see their apprehensions and prognoses coming true. Generalizations are wrong but who can deny that efficiency of administration is not India’s best introduction ? Who can deny that our elections have brought us a great stature in the world but have also brought corruption? And where is the doubt that the power and tyranny of wealth — CR’s startling phrase — rules the land?

Power, political and monetary power, outstrips ability by a long measure. And corruption in high places — Radhakrishnan’s astonishingly prescient expression — has disfigured the image of our public life.

As for the sweat of the brow, Raman’s ideal, that has long since ceased to be valued, especially in oneself. The concept of hard work, of service, of what used to be called pride in one’s work, is now an archaism. Except in our gifted artisans who survive miraculously, in our armed forces, in the body of farm labourers across the country and in a few remarkable professions like those of nurses and teachers, ‘work ethic’ is a national casualty.

We seek to derive the maximum advantage from the minimum effort. There is a mentality, widespread if not omnipresent, which sees the plodder as a fool, the successful shirker as clever. It only follows that the man or woman who is honest with money is regarded as naïve, to be pitied and the crook who gets caught making illegal money as unlucky. It is the honest politician, by which I mean one who does not encash files, sell favours, turn opportunities of service into ATMs, and there still are many of those, who keeps us in hope. It is, likewise, the exceptional official, doing the work of a hundred, who keeps the administrative machine from collapsing. Thank god there are some such exceptional men and women, still, amidst us. But by and large, the surface density of work-shirking, responsibility-dodging, blame-shifting, back-biting, tale-carrying and, alas, palm-itchy laggards has swelled beyond belief. What we are, the State is.

Radhakrishnan also spoke of intolerance.

This trait takes many forms but nowhere more seriously than in politics. Ironically and paradoxically, the denominationally intolerant are being projected as administratively able. Those with a questionable secular integrity are said to be men of unquestionable financial integrity.

The first three Bharat Ratnas foresaw more than ordinary mortals can. But even they could not foresee the self-contradictory piquancy of our predicament today. The liberal Indian, the Indian with a secular conscience, an innately democratic instinct, a value for civil rights, is shown up as effete , a political pansy, whereas the macho rattler of sabres, is offered to the nation as its saviour. A country with its work ethic weakened, its abilities outstripped by narrow self-interests, and its domination by the power and tyranny of wealth well-nigh complete, is easily persuaded to say ‘give us a benign dictator’. Fascism comforts the sloth of mind, the slow of thought, the valuationally sluggish. Fascism excites the timid, the languid and the bored.

And so we are seeing rise in the very heart of a democratic but languorous India a poison plume of the most corrosive 
intolerance. In the coming months the nation will be obsessed with who will ‘make it’ to the Lal Qila next August 15. That is only natural. But we should be agonizing about what kind of flag will be unfurled on its ramparts — the great national tricolour or one with a skull and crossed bones sewn behind it.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130815/jsp/opinion/story_17230988.jsp#.Ug8CytIwerZ